![]() |
||||
![]() |
Home | Contact | Site map | |||
| English | Espaņol |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Point to Point Protocol over Ethernet (PPPoE) Frequently Asked Questions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit our updated web site: www.finepoint.com Question Answer Visit our updated web site: www.finepoint.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer Also, PPP over Ethernet provides a major advantage for service providers by maximizing integration with - and minimizing disruption of - service providers' existing dial network infrastructures. Through tight integration with existing back office automation tools that ISPs have developed for dial customers, PPPoE enables rapid service deployment and cost savings. From authentication, accounting and secure access to configuration management, PPPoE supports a broad range of existing applications and services. The base protocol is defined in RFC 2516. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer In PPP over Ethernet, each session learns the Ethernet address of the remote peer to create a unique session identifier. And all this is done by requiring little or no configuration on the part of the end-user. By combining two standards, Ethernet and PPP, into PPPoE, no more knowledge is required of the end-user than is required to set up standard dial-up Internet access. The PPPoE solution uses existing PC hardware and software, existing Ethernet NICs, and existing ADSL/DSL modems. It requires no special configuration or additions to the customer premise modem or ADSL/DSL access network. Further, PPPoE does not alter in any way the collection of PPP protocols vital to ISPs wishing to deliver ADSL/DSL or other broadband services using their existing network model. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer Advantages of a PPP based broadband service
Negatives of PPPoA
What if the CPE was pre configured by the provider? This leads to increased
fulfillment costs. The provider would then have to configure each CPE
separately to enter the customer’s userid and password and loses
the ability to batch process the CPE PPPoE has positive features that can not be found in PPPoA, we'll look at those now.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer Disadvantages of PPTP not found in PPPoE
The above disadvantages are not found in PPPoE more specifically in Fine Point Technologies ServPoET and WinPoET combination. A PPPoE termination point, such as ServPoET can not be seen by outsiders to an ISP’s network. VPN technologies are set up and created in a way that anyone, anywhere can (with a userid and password) gain access to that network. PPPoE is designed that only users connected to that specific network can gain “access” to that specific PPPoE termination point. To show this let's briefly explain the PPPoE discovery phase: The PPPoE Discovery Stage is made up of four steps: initiation, offer, request, and session confirmation:
The above steps can only happen for a user who is directly connected
to that specific network. PPTP works in a way that any user can access
it and we’ll explain that next: We feel by showing the points above that PPPoE actually is a more secure
and robust solution for a Provider over Microsoft’s PPTP / VPN implementation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer One of the reasons ISPs would implement PPPoE in the CPE is the thought of reduced call centre support time. Traditionally the thought was, having to install 3rd party software on the PC would cause problems with the PC meaning more calls to the Call Centre for support, this is not the case many problems occur for an ISP call centre when Client-Side PPPoE is no longer an option. With Client-Side PPPoE Software, when a problem in the connection occurs the user is made aware of it and in most cases given an error message as to what has happened as well as what the possible solution may be. With CPE PPPoE this no longer happens, the End User is blind as to why there is a problem which means a frantic “uneducated” call to the call centre. In turn the ISP could grant an End User access to the CPE directly to see possible error messages. When this is done the End User has the ability to “break” the CPE configuration, if the CPE configuration is “broken” the ISP loses the ability to communicate with the CPE directly, causing another “uneducated” call to the Call Centre. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer For Example: ServPoET, offer the ability to roll out Dynamic Service Selection. This option allows you to set up different services and allows customers the ability to log in to them if you've set that up in your profile. With WinPoET, the customer can be shown that services are available for them to access (of course you'd want to charge them for use of these services). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question Answer When a router receives the frame, it reads the control information provided by the CPE then it strips the control information from the frame. It passes the frame up to the next layer, following the instructions that appeared in the control portion of the frame. Each subsequent layer will perform this same de-encapsulation process. With PPPoE this needs to be done with the Ethernet header, the PPPoE header, and then the PPP header leaving the TCP/IP payload. This operation is then done in reverse when the frame comes from the provider through the termination device to the CPE. This CPU intensive and memory intensive process leaves many trouble areas in Next Generation and Legacy routers, as well as this function has to be done at wire speed to not impact time sensitive applications such as VoIP. ISSUE CAUSED BY TERMINATING PPPOE ON A ROUTER Impact on Delivering New Services Hardware Expense At a profit margin per customer of only $2 per month, achieving profit after other installation costs (modem, software, and so on) have been covered would take approximately 7.5 months. The PPPoE server is a single point of failure in a network. If this one piece of equipment, which all customers must access to get online, fails, all customers can no longer access the Internet. This results in increased call center traffic and higher operating costs per customer. Multiple PPPoE servers capable of seamless loading balancing are the answer to this problem — but traditional and next-generation routers that include PPPoE functionality do not offer native load-balancing technology. Considering the high cost of next-generation routers, the unavailability of built-in load balancing limits the network engineer's options for creating a redundant network capable of 99.999% uptime. SOLUTION: OFFLOAD PPPOE THE RESULTS AND BENEFITS OF OFFLOADING PPPOE Increased Network capacity The router is freed to route the amount of prospective customers it was built out to handle, regaining its target threshold capacity. The full router capacity is now available for the introduction of value-added and next-generation services. A Load-Balanced, Redundant Network A unit specifically designed for PPPoE termination can be engineered to include native clustering technology. One such unit, the Fine Point Technologies ServPoET BMS, can be clustered to enable automatic load balancing of PPPoE network traffic among clustered units for improved service levels. The ServPoET SmartCluster™ technology evenly distributes sessions among cluster members, automatically removing members that fail or become unreachable. New cluster members can be hot-added to expand an existing cluster for additional capacity and performance, allowing administrators to scale their services with unprecedented time and cost savings.
Lower Per-Subscriber Cost Assuming a service provider per-customer profit margin of only $2 per month, it would take approximately 7.5 months to gain profit per customer after the cost of other installation aspects (modem, software, and so on—approximately $15 per subscriber) are covered. With this new model, profits begin immediately after installation costs have been covered — typically, beginning with the second month of service. Figure 6 compares the two PPPoE termination options. CONCLUSION |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright© 2006 Fine Point Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read our Legal Notice and Privacy Policy |